Lexicographic aspects of assessing students’ intellectual potentia

Authors

  • V. А. Shyrokov D. Sc. in Engineering (Hub), Academician of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Director, the Ukrainian Language and Information Foundation of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, [email protected]; ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5563-8907
  • M. V. Nadutenko PhD in Engineering, Head of the Department, the Ukrainian Language and Information Foundation of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, [email protected]; ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6732-8455
  • O. Ye. Stryzhak D. Sc. in Engineering (Hub), Professor, Deputy Director for Scientific Work, the NC “Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine, [email protected]; ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4954-3650
  • A. І. Gritchina PhD in Pedagogy, Deputy Director for Methodological Work, the NC “Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine, [email protected], ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8210-8167
  • A. A. Yaremenko graduate student, National University “Yuri Kondratiuk Poltava Polytechnic”, majoring in 172 Electronic communications and radio engineering, leading engineer of the software and computer networks department, NC “Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine, [email protected]; ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0116-0347

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51707/2618-0529-2024-30-03

Keywords:

linguistic technologies, lexicography, ontology, multidimensional evaluation, semantic field, narrative, rating.

Abstract

The article analyzes the process of using lexicographic models and systems to assess the levels of intellectual development of students. The category of lexicography is considered in detail. Lexicographic models and systems are considered as the conceptual basis of educational and scientific narratives that can be created by students in various thematic areas. To assess the intellectual potential, a method of comparing lexicographic models formed in the minds of students in the process of their educational and cognitive activities with lexicographic systems that define the conceptual basis of standardized thematic knowledge systems is proposed. It is proposed to use scientific works of world­famous scientists as standardized thematic knowledge systems. For this purpose, the concept of semantic field is introduced, which reflects the set of concepts that make up the thematic knowledge systems in the format of an ontology. The task of comparing lexicographic systems is to identify the levels of consolidation of ontologies. The use of Levenshtein distance, Voronoi diagrams, Lloyd’s algorithm, language modeling (Language Understanding) using the BERT approach as means of calculating the levels of equivalence and consolidation of lexicographic systems of students’ narratives and famous scientists is substantiated. The methods of multidimensional evaluation and ranking are used to calculate the levels of students’ lexicographic systems in relation to the systems of thematic knowledge of a famous scientist and the corresponding rating of their positioning in this system of scientist’s knowledge. The article presents an example of calculating the positioning of students’ lexicographic systems in the semantic field of the world­famous cyberneticist and mathematician Viktor Glushkov, based on the semantic analysis of students’ scientific works in the competition of the Junior Academy of Sciences, thematic area of cybernetics, mathematics.

References

Shyrokov, V. A. (2005). Elementy leksykohrafii [Elements of lexicography]. Kyiv : Dovira [in Ukrainian].

Piaget, J. (1951). The Psychology of Intelligence. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Smulson, M. L. (2003). Psykholohiia rozvytku intelektu [Psychology of intelligence development]. Kyiv : Nora-Druk [in Ukrainian].

Shyrokov, V. A. (2004). Fenomenolohiia leksykohrafichnykh system [Phenomenology of lexicographic systems]. Kyiv : Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Charpak, G., Léna, P., & Quéré, Y. (2005). Children and science / Edit. Odile Jacob [in French].

Kalytych, H. I. (2008). Konsolidatsiia informatsii, znan i mudrosti yak proektuvannia i osnova harmoniinoho postupu Ukrainy [Consolidation of information, knowledge and wisdom as design and basis of harmonious progress of Ukraine]. NTI, 1, 51 [in Ukrainian].

Jardine, D. A. (Ed.). (1977). The ANSI/SPARC DBMS Model : Proceedings of the Second SHARE Working. Canada, Montreal : North-Holland Pub. Co.

Rydeheard, D. E., & Burstall, R. M. (1988). Computational Category Theory. New York : Prentice Hall.

Cannataro, M., & Talia, D. (2004). Semantics and knowledge grids: building the next-generation grid. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 19 (1), 56–63.

Levenshtein, V. I. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Reports of the USSR Academy of Sciences Soviet Physics Doklady, 10 (8), 707–710.

Voronoi, G. F. (1908). New applications of continuous parameters to the theory of quadratic forms. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 134, 198–287 [in French].

Lloyd, S. (1982). Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 28, 2, 129–137.

Clark, K., Khandelwal, U., Levy, O., & Manning, C. D. (2019). What Does BERT Look at? An Analysis of BERT’s Attention. Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP : Proceedings of the 2019 ACL Workshop BlackboxNLP. Stroudsburg, PA, USA : Association for Computational Linguistics. (Pр. 276– 286). arXiv:1906.04341. DOI: 10.18653/v1/w19-4828.

Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback. The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania : RWS Publications.

Pluta, W. (1979). Methods of multivariate comparative analysis in modeling of infomwcj i economic of industrial combine. Wroclaw [in Polish].

Published

2024-12-11

How to Cite

Shyrokov V. А., Nadutenko, M. V., Stryzhak, O. Y., Gritchina A. І., & Yaremenko, A. A. (2024). Lexicographic aspects of assessing students’ intellectual potentia. Scientific Notes of Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, (2(30), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.51707/2618-0529-2024-30-03