Review of standards for creating training materials in learning management systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51707/2618-0529-2020-18-09Keywords:
ontology, standard, metrology, training, e-learning course, e-learning, distance learningAbstract
Creating educational content requires certain rules for creating content, as well as a number of specific stages of its creation, mechanisms and tools that are directly involved in this process. This paper provides an overview of the standards of creation, maintenance of electronic learning materials using learning management systems, as well as analysis and evaluation of their use of ontological systems. Four generations of standards for the creation and maintenance of e-learning materials and a description of each of them: the name of the standards for creating and maintaining the life cycle of e-learning course, as the basic principle of grouping e-learning materials. For some standards, the abbreviation of the standard name and a description of the features of the version are provided. Separately for each such standard the architecture and features of construction of a training course as the carrier of the educational information, its structural features, the applied software interface, principles of construction of electronic educational content with use of the above-stated standards are described. The question of further prospects for their development remains unanswered. Issues related to the process of designing the components of the training course, establishing links and relationships between them are considered separately. In particular, this review is an attempt to consider the standards of the course as allowing to create materials using ontological systems with hierarchical structuring of teaching materials and its subsequent support, as well as to assess the availability of tools to create ontologies as components for the presentation knowledge. In case of a negative answer, a constructive solution to this problem should be offered.
References
What is the AICC Standard and How is it Relevant to My eLearning Plan? The Docebo Learning Platform Official Website. (2010–2020). Retrieved from https://www.docebo.com/blog/whatisaiccand howisitrelevanttoelearning.
Formaty distantcionnogo obucheniia: sravnenie formatov AICC HACP, SCORM (1.2 и 2004), Tin Can (xAPI) и cmi5 [Distance learning formats: comparison of AICC HACP, SCORM (1.2 and 2004), Tin Can (xAPI) and cmi5 formats]. LMS List. (2007– 2019). Retrieved from https://lmslist.ru/aicc scormtincancmi5 [in Russian].
SCORM Overview. The SCORM Official Resource. (1999–2019). Retrieved from https://scorm.com/scormexplained/oneminutescormoverview.
ADL Specification Description. ADL WebSite (2003–2019). Retrieved from https://adlnet.gov
Why we should use the the SCORM. The SCORM Official Resource. (1999–2019). Retrieved from https://scorm.com/scormexplained/businessof scorm/benefitsofscorm
Technical Overview of the SCORM. The SCORM Official Resource. (1999–2019). Retrieved from https://scorm.com/scormexplained/techni- calscorm/
SCORM–Compilant LMS Software. Software Advice Resource. (2006–2020). Retrieved from https://www.softwareadvice.com/lms/scormcompa rison/p/all/
xAPI technical overview. xAPI Official Resour- ce. (1999–2019). Retrieved from https://xapi.com/overview/
Why should I implement the Experience API. xAPI Official Resource. (1999–2019). Retrieved from https://xapi.com/whyadopt/
Technical Overview of the Experience API. xAPI Official Resource. (1999–2019). Retrieved from https://xapi.com/developeroverview/
iSpring podderzhivaet cmi5 — novoe pokolenie SCORM [iSpring supports cmi5 — the next gene ration of SCORM]. iSpring Russian Community. (1999–2019). Retrieved from https://www.ispring.ru/elearninginsights/ispringpodderzhi-vaetcmi5novoepokoleniescorm/[in Russian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 SCIENTIFIC NOTES OF JUNIOR ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF UKRAINE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.