PROJECT 2061 AND OTHER SCIENTIFIC LITERACY INITIATIVES: OVERSEAS LESSONS FOR UKRAINIAN SCIENCE EDUCATORS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51707/2618-0529-2021-21_22-12Keywords:
academic standards, benchmarking, curriculum development, interactive learning, multidimetional approach, science education, scientific literacy.Abstract
A rapidly growing number of nations presently strive for the active development of competitive knowledge-based economy, making the issue of achieving science literacy one of the crucial global priorities. Acknowledgment of the role of scientific enterprise in the ideological, political, economic, social, and educational context has led to a rapid increase of attention this problem receives from specialists in various disciplines. Drawing on foreign experience, the authors of this article put before them the task of reviewing Project 2061 initiated by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) viewed as a promising approach to tackling the diminishing levels of science education both in our country and abroad. At the same time, we are interested in analyzing the underlying reasons that dictate the need to increase the scientific literacy of students representing various programs as they experience the effects of global technological advancement. The polydisciplinary nature of the natural sciences is yet another cardinal point of our current research since (when fully utilized) it allows one to approach study phenomena from all sides, thereby, forming a holistic picture of the world. As an international program aimed at assessing the academic achievements of schoolchildren PISA (Program for International Student Assessment) is based on precisely this kind of fruitful interdisciplinary method, whereby researchers gauge the level of the reading, mathematical, and natural scientific literacy of children. Serving as an effective evaluation tool, the PISA initiative not only helps estimate the volume of readily accessible knowledge but also measures the ability of learners to process information by utilizing scientific and critical thinking methods, dissect it and draw conclusions. Accordingly, it is our conviction that these academic benchmarking tools are invaluable for the modern generation of students worldwide as simple memorization and reproduction of information are on the cusp of being outperformed by the growing artificial intelligence industry which is able to provide more efficient alternatives for these simple mechanical knowledge acquisition skills. Consequently, if human intellectual development is swiftly reaching its bifurcation point we need to rely on ways of generating novel modes of thinking and problem-solving by taking into account consummate teaching methodologies that have the potential to serve as sure guidlines to increased global and national scientific progress and social wellbeing.
References
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The Nature of Science Education for enhancing Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Science Education, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 29 (11), 1347–1362. DOI: https://doi.org/ff10.1080/09500690601007549ff
Harlen, W. (2001). The Assessment of Scientific Literacy in the OECD/PISA Project. Studies in Science Education, 36 (1), 79–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260108560168
Bybee, R., McCrae, B., & Laurie, R. (2009). PISA 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (8), 865–883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20333
Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York : Oxford University Press.
Kolovou, M. (2021). Lessons from the Past: Reviewing How We Teach Science, What’s Changed, and Why It Matters. Science & Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00267-2
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Project 2061. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York : Oxford University Press.
Goldston, D., & Bland, J. (2002). Trailing Halley’s Comet: Transforming Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education Through Interdisciplinary Collaborations in Higher Education. School Science and Mathematics, 102 (6), 241–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17882.x
Koppal, M., & Caldwell, A. (2004). Meeting the Challenge of Science Literacy: Project 2061 Efforts To Improve Science Education. Cell Biology Education, 3 (1), 28–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.03-10-0016
Clark, J. (2005). Curriculum studies in initial teacher education: the importance of holism and project 2061. Curriculum Journal, 16 (4), 509–521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500384636
She, H. C., Stacey, K., & Schmidt, W. H. (2018). Science and Mathematics Literacy: PISA for Better School Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16 (S1), 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10763-018-9911-1
Howell, E. L., & Brossard, D. (2021). (Mis)informed about what? What it means to be a science-literate citizen in a digital world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118 (15). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912436117
UNESCO. (1993). Final Report: International Forum on Scientific and Technological Literacy for All.
Mc Eneaney, E. H. (2003). The Worldwide Cachet of Scientific Literacy. Comparative Education Review, 47 (2), 217–237. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1086/376539
UNESCO. Declaration on science and the use of scientific knowledge (1999). Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/science/wcs/eng/declaration_e.htm
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientific notes of Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.