Artificial intelligence supervising the choice of an individual educational trajectory: a psychological aspect

Authors

  • S. V. Dembitska D. Sc. in Pedagogy, Professor of the Department of life safety and safety pedagogy, Vinnytsia National Technical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine, [email protected]; ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2005-6744

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51707/2618-0529-2024-31-02

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, individual educational trajectory, critical thinking, educational technologies, psychology of learning, improvement of the educational process.

Abstract

Modern trends in the development of the educational sector indicate the growing relevance of research aimed atimproving teaching methods and tools that meet the needs of society. In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising tool for personalising education and ensuring the effectiveness of students’ learning activities. The intensive use of AI in various spheres of life, including education, necessitates the study of its impact on the psychological aspects of learning. It is important to understand how AI affects students’ motivation, self-esteem, emotional state, and other psychological characteristics. Based on the analysis of scientific publications, the article identifies prospects for building an individual educational trajectory of higher education students using AI and possible risks of this process (dependence on technology, breach of confidentiality, prejudice and discrimination, reduced social interaction, risk of loss of motivation, unequal access to technology, etc.) A number of key psychological aspects of students’ interaction with AI that require further research are highlighted, in particular: the impact of AI on students’ motivation and self-esteem, perception of AI recommendations, transparency and explanation of AI decisions, ethical aspects of using AI, as well as psychological barriers to AI adoption. The term “Artificial Intelligence Supervision of the Choice of Individual Educational Trajectory” is defined and substantiated. The results of a study among students of Vinnytsia National Technical University (VNTU) on the readiness of students to use AI to build an individual educational trajectory are analysed, and the peculiarities of this process are identified. Prospects for further research include the development of recommendations for the optimal use of AI, taking into account the psychological characteristics of students.

References

Drach, I., Petroie, O., Borodiienko, O., Reheilo, I., Bazeliuk, O., & Bazeliuk, N.et al. (2023). Vykorystannia shtuchnoho intelektu u vyshchii osviti [Use of artificial intelligence in higher education]. Universytety i liderstvo — Universities and leadership, 15, 66‒82 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31874/2520-6702-2023-15-66-82.

Kovachov, S., & Sychikova, Ya. (2023). Pohovory zi mnoiu: dialoh zi shtuchnym intelektom pro vykorystannia yoho v navchanni ta naukovykh doslidzhenniakh [Talk to me: A dialogue with artificial intelligence about its use in education and research]. Naukovi zapysky Berdianskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pedahohika — Scientific notes of Berdiansk State Pedagogical University. Series: Pedagogy, (1), 43‒55 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31494/2412-9208-2023-1-1-43-55.

Boltsi, A., Kalovrektis, K., Xenakis, A., Chatzimisios, P., & Chaikalis, C. (2024). Digital Tools, Technologies, and Learning Methodologies for Education 4.0 Frameworks: A STEM Oriented Survey. IEEE Access (Education Society), 12, 12883–12901.

Fegade, A., Raut, R., Deshpande, A., Kaul, N., & Khanna, V. (2023). Unleashing the Power of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Exploring its Boundless Potential and Over-coming Challenges in Academic Environments. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I), pp. 1243–1249, IEEE, Gautam Buddha Nagar.

Fan, X., & Li, J. (2023). Artificial Intelligence-Driven Interactive Learning Methods for Enhancing Art and Design Education in Higher Institutions. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37 (1).

Graham, T., Scarlett, H., & Braham, S. E. (2023). Student Academic Advisement Augmented by Artificial Intelligence in the School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Technology, Jamaica. In: 2023 Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, & Applied Computing (CSCE), pp. 1115–1118, IEEE, Las Vegas.

Aler Tubella, A., Mora-Cantallops, M., & Nieves, J. C. (2024). How to teach responsible AI in Higher Education: challenges and opportunities. Ethics and Information Technology, 26 (3), 1–14.

Hasanein, A. M., & Sobaih, A. E. E. (2023). Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education: Key Stakeholder Perspectives. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psycholgy and Education, 13, 2599–2614.

Yang, Q.-F., Lian, L.-W., & Zhao, J.-H. (2023). Developing a gamified artificial intelligence educational robot to promote learning effectiveness and behavior in laboratory safety courses for undergraduate students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 18.

Dembitska, S., Kuzmenko, O., Savchenko, I., Demianenko, V., & Hanna, S. (2024). Digitization of the Educational and Scientific Space Based on STEAM Education. In: Auer, M. E., Cukierman, U. R., Vendrell Vidal, E., Tovar Caro, E. (Eds.). Towards a Hybrid, Flexible and Socially Engaged Higher Education. ICL 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 901. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53022-7_34.

Kuzmenko, O., Rostoka, M., Dembitska, S., Topolnik, Y., & Miastkovska, M. (2022). Innovative and Scientific ECO Environment: Integration of Teaching Information and Communication Technologies and Physics. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 390 LNNS, pp. 29‒36. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-93907-6_4.

Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with Artificial Intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54, 1160–1173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13337.

Farrokhnia M., Banihashem S. K., Noroozi O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of CHATGPT: Implications for educational practice and Research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61, 1‒15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846.

Popenici, S. A., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and

learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12 (1), 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8.

Ungerer, L., & Slade, S. (2022). Ethical Considerations of Artificial Intelligence in Learning Analytics in Distance Education Contexts. In P. Prinsloo, S. Slade, M. Khalil (Eds.). Learning Analytics in Open and Distributed Learning: Potential and Challenges. Singapore : Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0786-9_8.

Pisica, A. I., Edu, T., Zaharia, R. M., & Zaharia, R. (2023). Implementing Artificial Intelligence in higher education: PROS and cons from the perspectives of Academics. Societies, 13 (5), 118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13050118.

Sabzalieva, E., & Valentini, A. (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: quick start guide. UNESCO International Institute for Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385146.locale=en.

Androshchuk, A. & Maliuha, O. (2024). Vykorystannia shtuchnoho intelektu u vyshchii osviti: stan i tendentsii [The use of artificial intelligence in higher education: status and trends]. International Science Journal of Education & Linguistics, 3, 27‒35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjel.20240302.04.

Published

2024-12-11

How to Cite

Dembitska, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence supervising the choice of an individual educational trajectory: a psychological aspect. Scientific Notes of Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, (№ 3 (31), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.51707/2618-0529-2024-31-02