USE OF MOBILE APPLICATIONS TO IDENTIFY PLANTS

Authors

  • Zh. I. Bilyk PhD in Biology, Senior Researcher of the Department of instructional-thematic systems, NC “Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine, [email protected]; ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2092-5241
  • Ye. B. Shapovalov PhD in Engineering, Senior Researcher of the Department of instructional-thematic systems, NC “Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine, [email protected]; ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3732-9486
  • V. B. Shapovalov Senior Researcher of the Department of Creation and Use of Intelligent Network Tools, NC “Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine, [email protected]; ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000- 0001-6315-649X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51707/2618-0529-2021-21_22-03

Keywords:

Mobile Application, learning environment, STEM-classes, Plant Identification, Google Lens.

Abstract

One of the main principles of effective learning is the principle of «corresponding to nature», ie providing the environment in which the child learns should be familiar to him. For the modern child, the environment of gadgets has become a natural environment. That is why the use of mobile applications is a very promising method of learning. Software that can be used during the learning process in the application of STEM technology can be divided into desktop applications, mobile applications, and web-oriented technologies. The paper is devoted to research mobile applications used during the STEM-classes and can be used to identify plants. There are 10 mobile applications that are plant identifiers worldwide. These applications can be classified into three groups, such as plant identifiers that can analyze photos, plant classification provides the possibility to identify plants manually, plants-care apps that remind water of the plant, or change the soil. The following mobile applications were analysed: Flora Incognita, PlantNet, PlantSnap, PictureThis, LeafSnap, Seek, PlantNet regarding ease of use and identification accuracy. PlantNet is the easiest app to install. Also, pretty easy to install are LeafSnap and Flora Incognita. Apps LeafSnap, Flora Incognita, and Seek to have the simplest interface. PlantSnap, PictureThis, and PlantNet are characterized by the most uncomfortable process of identification which can be complicated for teachers. Seek is the interesting application, which provides detailed instructions for students on research. This application also has tools to encourage students and offers participation in international research projects. It has been proven that Flora Incognita and PlantNet have the most user friendly and most informative interface of plant identification programs. Flora Incognita provides correct identification of 71% of plants compared to 55% provided by PlantNet. For comparison, this figure for Google Lens is 92.6%. However, they were significantly less accurate than the Google Lens results. Therefore, Google Lens is the most recommended app to use. Talking to account, results of usability analysis, and quality of analysis, for those students and teachers who do not like Google Lens app, it is possible to use Flora Incognita, but PlantNet can’t be recommended to use due low accuracy which may provide up to half of incorrect analysing results. Although Flora Incognita identifies species of local (aboriginal) flora with higher accuracy. A detailed experimental study of Google Lens and its comparison with other mobile applications allow us to recommend Google Lens for use in the lessons when applying the STEM approach.

References

Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Fabiani, P., Benesova, W., Meneses, M. D., & Mora, C. E. (2015). Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education. Comput. Human Behav. 51, 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.093

Kinateder, M., Ronchi, E., Nilsson, D., Kobes, M., Müller, M., Pauli, P., et al. (2014). Virtual Reality for Fire Evacuation Research. Proc. 2014 Fed. Conf. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 2, 313–321. https://doi.org/10.15439/2014f94

Modlo, Y. O., Semerikov, S. O., Bondarevskyi, S. L., Tolmachev, S. T., Markova, O. M., Nechypurenko, P. P. (2020). Methods of using mobile Internet devices in the formation of the general scientific component of bachelor in electromechanics competency in modeling of technical objects. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2547, 217–240.

Shapovalov, V. B., Atamas, A. I., Bilyk, Z. I., Shapovalov, Y. B., Uchitel, A. D., Bilyk, Z. I. (2018). Structuring Augmented Reality Information on the stemua. science. Proc. 1st Int. Work. Augment. Real. Educ. (AREdu 2018). 2257, 75–86.

Agustina, W. W., Sumarto, S., Trisno, B. (2019). Augmented reality based on stem for supporting science literacy in vocational education. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1375. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1375/1/012088

Modlo, Y., Yechkalo, V., Semerikov, S. O., Tkachuk, V. (2017). Using technology of augmented reality in a mobile-based learning environment of the higher educational institution. Nauk. zapysky, Seriia Probl. Metod. Fiz. I tekhnolohichnoi Osv. 11, 93–100.

Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., et al. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Comput. Educ. 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002

Park, N. (2011). The Development of STEAM Career Education Program using Virtual Reality Technology. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 44, 085201. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201

Sarabando, C., Cravino, J. P., & Soares, A. A. (2014). Contribution of a Computer Simulation to Students’ Learning of the Physics Concepts of Weight and Mass. Procedia Technol. 13, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.02.015

Shapovalov, V. B., Shapovalov, Y. B., Bilyk, Z. I., & Megalinska, A. P. (2020). The Google Lens analyzing quality: an Analysis of the possibility to use in the educational process. Proc. 2st Int. Work. Augment. Real. Educ. (AREdu 2019).

Stryzhak, O. Y., Prychodniuk, V., & Podlipaiev, V. (2019). Model of Transdisciplinary Representation of GEOspatial Information. Adv. Inf. Commun. Technol. 560, 34–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12385-7

Modlo, Y. O., Semerikov, S. O., Nechypurenko, P. P., Bondarevskyi, S. L., Bondarevska, O. M., & Tolmachev, S. T. (2019). The use of mobile Internet devices in the formation of ICT component of bachelors in electromechanics competency in modeling of technical objects. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2433, 413–428.

Dziabenko, O., & Budnyk, O. (2019). Go-Lab Ecosystem: Using Online Laboratories in a Primary School. EDULEARN19 Proc. 1, 9276–9285. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.2304

Kim, L., Revd, S., Timm, C. D. (2015). Through the Google Lens : Development of lecturing practice in Photography This work is submitted in fulfillment of the requirements at the Durban University of Technology.

Published

2022-04-17

How to Cite

Bilyk, Z., Shapovalov, Y. B., & Shapovalov, V. (2022). USE OF MOBILE APPLICATIONS TO IDENTIFY PLANTS. Scientific Notes of Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, (2-3(21-22), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.51707/2618-0529-2021-21_22-03